Skip to content

Add team performance section with graphs - #20

Merged
Modsofthenation merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/team-performance-graphs-e5b1
Jul 25, 2026
Merged

Modsofthenation merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/team-performance-graphs-e5b1

Conversation

@Modsofthenation

@Modsofthenation Modsofthenation commented Jul 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Adds a Team performance analytics page so you can see cycle-wide rating shape, competency averages, writing effort, coaching themes, and prior-cycle movement — not just the text cycle dashboard on Home / Consistency cards.

What’s included

  • GET /api/team-performance?cycleId= aggregating overall distribution, competency means, promo readiness, writing-time buckets, levels, 1:1 themes, open concerns, evidence coverage, and per-person rows (with prior-cycle overall Δ when available)
  • New nav page /team-performance with CSS/SVG charts (histogram, evidence scatter, horizontal bars, competency sparklines) — no new chart library
  • Link from Home cycle dashboard → Team performance
  • Unit tests for the pure aggregator; docs updated in FEATURES / CORE_LOOP_EVAL

Screenshots

Team performance graphs
People table
Home link

How to try

  1. Unlock workspace, open Team performance in the sidebar (or Home → Charts)
  2. Pick a cycle; graphs fill as manager drafts get overall / competency scores and feedback themes

To show artifacts inline, enable in settings.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Aggregate ratings, competencies, writing effort, themes, and prior-cycle
deltas into /api/team-performance and a new Team performance nav page.

Co-authored-by: Damon  <[email protected]>
@Modsofthenation
Modsofthenation marked this pull request as ready for review July 25, 2026 12:21
@Modsofthenation
Modsofthenation merged commit c538f98 into main Jul 25, 2026
2 checks passed
@cursor
cursor Bot deleted the cursor/team-performance-graphs-e5b1 branch August 12, 2026 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants